A litigant must justify the removal of a juror due to disqualifying factors in which type of challenge?

Prepare for the Digital Court Reporting Fundamentals Test. Equip yourself with flashcards, questions, and detailed explanations. Excel in your exam!

Multiple Choice

A litigant must justify the removal of a juror due to disqualifying factors in which type of challenge?

Explanation:
The main idea is that when a juror must be removed because they have a disqualifying bias or factor, a for-cause challenge is used. This type requires you to show a specific reason—such as obvious bias, a close relationship to a party, or an inability to be impartial—that would prevent fair deliberation. The judge then decides whether that reason is sufficient to excuse the juror. Peremptory challenges, by contrast, do not require any justification; they allow removal for non-discriminatory reasons within limits. Voir dire is the process of questioning potential jurors to uncover biases and determine who to challenge. Mistrial is not related to removing jurors; it ends the trial with no verdict.

The main idea is that when a juror must be removed because they have a disqualifying bias or factor, a for-cause challenge is used. This type requires you to show a specific reason—such as obvious bias, a close relationship to a party, or an inability to be impartial—that would prevent fair deliberation. The judge then decides whether that reason is sufficient to excuse the juror.

Peremptory challenges, by contrast, do not require any justification; they allow removal for non-discriminatory reasons within limits. Voir dire is the process of questioning potential jurors to uncover biases and determine who to challenge. Mistrial is not related to removing jurors; it ends the trial with no verdict.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy